<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technological Innovation and Leadership – The Guide to Successful Innovations (The 1st of a Many Part Series)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.befoxy.in/technological-innovation-and-leadership-%e2%80%93-the-guide-to-successful-innovations-the-1st-of-a-many-part-series/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.befoxy.in/technological-innovation-and-leadership-%e2%80%93-the-guide-to-successful-innovations-the-1st-of-a-many-part-series</link>
	<description>The FoxyMoron Blog - Your Guide to Being Digitally, Aesthetically, and Creatively Foxy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:02:36 -0600</lastBuildDate><generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>	<item>
		<title>By: HarshilJK</title>
		<link>http://www.befoxy.in/technological-innovation-and-leadership-%e2%80%93-the-guide-to-successful-innovations-the-1st-of-a-many-part-series/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>HarshilJK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.befoxy.in/technological-innovation-and-leadership-%e2%80%93-the-guide-to-successful-innovations-the-1st-of-a-many-part-series#comment-34</guid>		<description>I acknowledge the idea of an entrepreneurs spirit. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What im trying to propose, is the fact that an innovator needs to be neither market driving nor market driven. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;By identifying generic benefits to consumers, innovators can understand why consumers buy products and then let their imagination fly by including product features that may be market driving. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But yea the fact is that sometimes this approach may fail in identifying meta trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I acknowledge the idea of an entrepreneurs spirit. </p>
<p>What im trying to propose, is the fact that an innovator needs to be neither market driving nor market driven. </p>
<p>By identifying generic benefits to consumers, innovators can understand why consumers buy products and then let their imagination fly by including product features that may be market driving. </p>
<p>But yea the fact is that sometimes this approach may fail in identifying meta trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: sachinuppal</title>
		<link>http://www.befoxy.in/technological-innovation-and-leadership-%e2%80%93-the-guide-to-successful-innovations-the-1st-of-a-many-part-series/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>sachinuppal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.befoxy.in/technological-innovation-and-leadership-%e2%80%93-the-guide-to-successful-innovations-the-1st-of-a-many-part-series#comment-31</guid>		<description>Well interesting thought and approach towards looking at how companies might be innovating. Though in a lot of cases, i am seeing that even though when customers are engaged in a conversation to understand what they want, you would see a 50-50 divide of people...who know what they want and people who actually do not know if they would want something like that or not.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Interestingly if Akio Morita, would have given heed to customer&#039;s voice we wouldn&#039;t have seen SONY&#039;s walkmans and if Steve would have heard the customer&#039;s voice we wouldn&#039;t have seen iPods. &lt;br/&gt;Though i completely like your idea of listening to basic needs of people,&quot;Thus a technological strategy should begin with the fundamental need of customers and work with a problem solving approach, an approach that satisfies a need and improvises a benefit.&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is where entreprenuer&#039;s spirit works and makes him successful(Steve Jobs) or the idea may just fail and u might be in deep losses (Iridium phones).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well interesting thought and approach towards looking at how companies might be innovating. Though in a lot of cases, i am seeing that even though when customers are engaged in a conversation to understand what they want, you would see a 50-50 divide of people&#8230;who know what they want and people who actually do not know if they would want something like that or not.</p>
<p>Interestingly if Akio Morita, would have given heed to customer&#8217;s voice we wouldn&#8217;t have seen SONY&#8217;s walkmans and if Steve would have heard the customer&#8217;s voice we wouldn&#8217;t have seen iPods. <br />Though i completely like your idea of listening to basic needs of people,&#8221;Thus a technological strategy should begin with the fundamental need of customers and work with a problem solving approach, an approach that satisfies a need and improvises a benefit.&#8221; </p>
<p>This is where entreprenuer&#8217;s spirit works and makes him successful(Steve Jobs) or the idea may just fail and u might be in deep losses (Iridium phones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>	</item></channel>
</rss>
