Archived entries forWeb

Capturing your Screen on Video to Create Tutorials or More

Have you ever wanted to capture things from your screen and share them with your friends either online or for projects?

Well, i often have.

I did know about a couple of softwares that do it but they were pretty steep. Camtasia Studio, one of the most well recognized names when it comes to screen capture is all that i had heard about.

Camtasia Studio costs about $300 so its worth investing in it only if you screen capture for a living and make HD Videos out of the same.

Then there is Snagit again by the guys who have made Camtasia Studio. It has some cool effects and features and costs $50. Its useful for people who have a budget and want to mess around a little with screen capture stuff.

I however, would love to do these things for free. There are 2 good online applications that i know of that can help you do the same. Unfortunately, they aren’t offline applications i.e. you won’t be able to create an MOV or AVI out of them directly (there are a lof of ways and means through which you can do that – or there will be very soon)

The 1st application is called Jing. It too is powered by the guys at TechSmith (the same guys who power Camtasia and Snagit).

The tool is pretty neat by itself. Its completely free to do a normal screen capture. Once you download the tool and install it, you get a little sun shaped icon on the top right of your screen and this enables you to go into the options. Once the video is recorded, you can upload it straight to ScreenCast.com (one more of those TechSmith properties).

The Jing Project Interface
The Jing Project Interface
The Jing Project Icon for the Mac OSX
The Jing Project Icon

The tool is pretty nifty and its also very sleek in terms of its design. One of the features that i particularly like about the tool is the fact that i can record my voice (if i have a mic on my PC) when i am recording the screencast. That’s great in terms of creating rough videos. There is no online audio or video editor however.

The other bad part is that because the video gets uploaded to screencast.com, there is no direct embed option which is sort of imperfect for sharing the video. The service thus is pretty restrictive in the sense that you cannot take the video outside to the web (and subsequently to your viewer) but have to bring your viewer to the video. There is YouTube export but that is only on paid accounts.

The 2nd (and in my opinion better) service that i found is called ScreenToaster.

Screentoaster is pretty much the same as Jing and a little more. It should be a lot more in a few weeks.

For Starters:

a) You don’t need to download any software

b) You get as much flexibility with video recording your screen as you want. Size ranges are a plently and customizable.

c) You can add subtitles after the video is done.

Record Sound & Add SubtitlesRecord and Add Subtitles

d) You can also record sound over the recorded video. While there is no live recording as is in Jing (its coming), i find post recording a lot more useful as one can do a better, more focussed job.

e) You can embed whatever you have screencasted extremely easily. Sharing options are better as well.

Sharing Options are Better
Sharing Options are Better

Unfortunately there is no live editing of the video or audio on screentoaster either.

They are coming out with a YouTube video export soon. Once that happens, you can download these videos as well.All about downloading YouTube videos in the next post!

ScreenToaster is a perfect acquisition target for YouTube. I hope Rudy Viard and the team get their due.

By the way, apart from tutorials, what else would you use Video Capture Softwares for? BeFoxy. Lend us some suggestions!

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Facebook Introduces Web Search via Live.com within the Network. Social Search beckons?

I don’t know if this is breaking news or if its been there for a while (i dint find a post about it) but it seems like Facebook has now started to search the web as well from within Facebook probably using Live.com technology.  

When i was randomly searching for a potential client on Facebook today, something came up. It asked if i wanted to search the web or only search Facebook.

The results appear within Facebook. So its not redirecting to Live.com. As i see it Live.com has no real tangible benefit. No ads are being sold, no Live.com logo on the search page.

The only benefit is the association of Live with Facebook (Microsoft has paid a hefty sum for that!) which may make Live seem a little sexier. They have repeatedly tried to get more users stick into the Live.com search platform but no luck so far.

This again indicates that the guys at Facebook want Facebook to be the center of the average internet user’s (and indeed PC user’s) universe. It started with the start tab kind of application tab and now search. Applications have already ensured that users do more inside of Facebook and now with Facebook Connect becoming stronger along with Data portability into Facebook, it clearly shows that Facebook is looking to provide the user with everthing it can from 1 destination. A Facebook browser has been spoken about – they may do that at another stage only after looking at the success of Google Chrome. Till then they may be looking to capitalize on as much functionality for Facebook across browser to deepen user involvement.

The other thing that comes out of this is Facebook and Live together may be experimenting with social search where users recommend contextuality of results and recommend and rate things over time. No indication of that yet, but we may see that. Facebook already has the community – now they can create a search eco – system around it.

  • Share/Bookmark

Copyright © 2004–2009. All rights reserved.

RSS Feed.