Interesting Approach to Community Building for Sports Teams
The recent developments by Royal Challengers Bangalore has shown an interesting approach to community building.
The brand is looking for 3 fans to run the community – they’ve launched the Fanatic Fans Challenge.
They’re looking for 3 fans to spearhead and run the community.
The plan for now, seems to be to get the 3 fans at all locations where the team plays and post insights onto the Royal Challengers community and thus maintain the flow of content and specific interactions on the social network. The fans thus become like superstars. They are bound to be on TV and their comments on social media being widely read make them mini benchmark commentators of sorts. This will surely propel them to keep writing without costing the challengers a lot.
This is particularly interesting because so far brands have really failed to create engagement in their branded community once the media spends stop. Few brand communities that i have had a chance to gain access to have shown dismal stats. 60 – 100 active users/ fans per day on a community that’s a lakh strong.
Most of them have made the mistake of trying to be providence communities. They have thrown in groups, events, music etc. (mostly using White Label Social Networking Platforms to save costs) – things that consumers don’t care about.
The key question – why will a consumer come to your community if he/she can do this on Facebook anyway.
The key for brands is to figure out what they can give ‘extra’ in their brand community that their existing social network does not offer and sync that with the objective of the brand communities.
I have heard non sensical objectives so far – “We want to own a base that we can communicate with/ We want to own an email database” – that’s fine! But if you don’t know what the carrot for the base will be on YOUR network why not just have the base on a Facebook/ Orkut/ Twitter instead of spending monies on building your own?
To get back to the Royal Challengers, something refreshing is that once you log into the community, you have just 1 thing you can do – share your media, your thoughts, read, and comment – so for now its more like a community built around a content piece – which is interesting. They seemed to have figured out that (duhh) that fans of the Royal Challengers come to the website or would come to a community ONLY if there is relevant cricket centered RCB content – and that’s what they’re keen to provide – content and content related interactions that you wont get anywhere on the web!

I was speaking to my friend Fundubytes (Rupesh) who was one of the key people in the ideation team at EC who came up with the idea of finding fanatic fans – he guided me to the core of their insight.

A Royal Challengers community on Orkut that has allocated responsibility of managing the community to fans (the community is managed by a fan). So 1 fan is responsible for pictures, 1 for analytics, 1 for polls etc. This automatically makes sure that content is active and stakeholders keep creating their content mostly because they are recognized. Moreover you find the best quality content.
I had done something similar when i was managing a Force India F1 Community. I gave members who were active the status of ‘Pit Crew’. Special members who had unique skill sets (knowledge, driving skills) were given titles such as ‘Resident Think Tank’ and ‘Driving Champ’ etc. This motivated members to a large extent and made sure they promoted the group, and its content. The ones who were listening in also found the concept a lot more meaningful.

For that community i had noticed that people came to the community only during race weekends. A few other people managing sports communities also noticed the same thing.
This may not necessarily be true at all times but i think it’s safe to assume that fans come to a sporting community only when there is a match/ race or a large sporting decision is made (signing of new players, unveiling of cars/ technology/ stadiums).
Brands need to realize this and say that it’s OK to have maximum traffic and these periods and invest in applications/ ideas/ contests that maximize the use experience on sporting event days. For the rest of the days, producing peripheral content about the sport/ things that go on at the team/ sneak peaks/ and building heritage for the club/ team is a good idea. That’s where pools of fan ambassadors are useful.
I actually think that the Facebook Pages platform has got it spot on in terms of pushing the right levers for consumer engagement. Some of the things i think they have done well are:
- Consolidated folder for fan photos & videos
- Easy response – ‘like’ + Comment
- Consumers can share multimedia with their status
- Its a feed
- The brand is a center of the conversation
- Singularity in interaction focus with multiple tools at the consumers’ disposal
A brand community where i have seen good interactions is the Brawn GP fan wall. 2 reasons. 1) Its easy 2) Its winning – i think its definitely a way brands should consider going towards rather than building providence communities.
Here’s my idea of an ideal fan community for a sports team (it could apply to a couple of other categories as well)
Please forgive the art work – the idea is to give an insight into the functionality.
Explained a little in detail:
What do you think the communities of sports teams should be like? I’d love to know.
I also can’t wait to get my hands on a brand that actually allows us to be in the heat of things and help then build and activate their brand community!
If you do know someone please drop me a line!
I’d also like to know what my friends (Asfaq, Gaurav, Anil,Rajiv, Manu,Rohan, Rupesh, Maneesh, Sahil, Mihir, Moksh and Eklavya) in social media who have been involved in building communities or writing about community building think. Do lend your thoughts on how you think brand communities should be built and who you think is getting it right
(At the end of 2007 i had said that brands should look to build generic communities. I was wrong.)
























